Skip to content
FollowNet One vs. Excel

Your Comex operation no longer fits in a spreadsheet.

Excel was built for data. Not for operations with 50 stages, 20 partners and deadlines that become demurrage if nobody sees the alert.

CriteriaExcelFollowNet One
Status updatesManual, by each analystAutomatic — integrated with Siscomex, CEMercante, partners
Deadline alertsDo not exist — depend on who remembersAutomatic and predictive before free time expires
Visibility per processOne tab per process, no traceabilityComplete timeline of each process in real time
Partner accessManual file sending by emailAccess portal configurable by profile
KPIs and dashboardsChart made by hand in each reportIntegrated BI with indicators updated automatically
ERP integrationNone — manual importIntegration with SAP, OSGT (Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Global Trade), TOTVS and via XML/API
Audit and historyNot traceable — who edited what?Complete history by process and by user
Scale with volumeSpreadsheet freezes above a certain volumeDesigned for thousands of simultaneous processes

Why the spreadsheet works, until it stops working

At first, the spreadsheet works. Few processes, one person who knows everything by heart, and a manually updated status column handles it. The problem appears as volume grows: every new shipment is another row, every partner another email, and the status is only correct while someone remembers to update it. When nobody sees the free time alert in time, the spreadsheet does not warn you, and the cost becomes demurrage. It is not that Excel is bad; it simply was not built to run processes with dozens of simultaneous stages, deadlines and partners.

What changes with foreign trade software

Instead of a spreadsheet that depends on whoever updates it, the foreign trade software pulls status automatically from the sources (Siscomex, CEMercante, partners) and shows each process on a real-time timeline. Deadline alerts are predictive: the system warns before free time expires, not after. Partners access a portal configurable by profile, with no manual file exchange. And the history is auditable: who did what, when. The practical difference is moving from reactive mode (firefighting once the problem has already happened) to exception-based mode, where the team focuses only on what needs action.

Antonio Dantas

Before FollowNet One, we controlled everything in a spreadsheet. It seemed to work — until the day the spreadsheet was not updated and we paid demurrage for no reason.

Antonio Dantas — Crane Worldwide Logistics

Frequently asked questions

Yes. Many clients import and export data via XML/API and keep spreadsheets for ad hoc analysis. The difference is that operational control (status, deadlines, alerts) now lives in the platform, not the spreadsheet.
There is no fixed number, but the tipping point is usually when one person can no longer keep the status updated manually without error. Often a few dozen simultaneous processes with multiple partners.
The implementation team maps your current operation and configures the platform accordingly. Relevant historical data can be imported; the process is led by a Lean Six Sigma certified team.
Yes. The platform monitors free time by carrier and triggers predictive alerts before expiration, avoiding the cost a spreadsheet does not warn about.
No. Unlike a complex spreadsheet full of macros that depend on one person, the platform is maintained by e.Mix, with specialist support and a certified Key User on your team.
Partner access is via a profile-configurable portal, part of the platform. Licensing details are handled according to operation size in the proposal.
First gains appear in about 30 days after contracting, with implementation led in stages by the e.Mix team.
Yes. There is integration with SAP, TOTVS, OSGT (Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Global Trade) and others via XML/API, eliminating the manual import a spreadsheet requires.

Ready to move beyond Excel?

In 30 minutes, a consultant shows how FollowNet One solves exactly the points where Excel fails in your operation.